Regional Insights
View the detailed results of our global survey by country and region. Reach out to your Protiviti contact for more detailed insights or contact us.
Does your company have clearly defined innovation goals?
| North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes |
78% |
79% |
79% |
| No |
22% |
21% |
21% |
|
I don't know |
0% |
0% |
0% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Yes |
81% |
69% |
| No |
19% |
31% |
| I don't know | 0% |
0% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes |
76% |
82% |
78% |
78% |
82% |
| No |
24% |
18% |
22% |
22% |
18% |
| I don't know |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
| Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes |
76% |
76% |
78% |
90% |
84% |
72% |
80% |
| No |
24% |
24% |
22% |
10% |
16% |
28% |
20% |
| I don't know |
0% |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which of the below best describes the status of your company's technology innovation strategy?
|
North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
We have a clear innovation strategy |
54% |
56% |
53% |
| We are currently developing an innovation strategy |
40% |
38% |
43% |
|
We have no plans to create an innovation strategy |
6% |
6% |
4% |
|
US |
Canada |
|
|---|---|---|
| We have a clear innovation strategy | 55% |
49% |
| We are currently developing an innovation strategy |
40% |
40% |
| We have no plans to create an innovation strategy |
5% |
11% |
|
UK |
Germany |
Italy |
France |
Netherlands |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| We have a clear innovation strategy |
58% |
58% |
56% |
58% |
50% |
| We are currently developing an innovation strategy |
36% |
32% |
40% |
38% |
48% |
| We have no plans to create an innovation strategy |
6% |
10% |
4% |
4% |
2% |
|
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| We have a clear innovation strategy |
42% |
58% |
56% |
48% |
58% |
54% |
58% |
| We are currently developing an innovation strategy |
50% |
38% |
40% |
48% |
40% |
42% |
40% |
| We have no plans to create an innovation strategy |
8% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
2% |
4% |
2% |
What percentage of your company's current innovation activity is focused on each of the following areas?
Shown: Mean scores
|
North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Optimisation (of current systems, products, processes etc.) |
42% |
42% |
41% |
|
Building Resilience (against disruption) |
30% |
28% |
28% |
|
Growth (new markets, revenue, etc.) |
28% |
30% |
31% |
|
Other |
0% |
0% |
1% |
|
US |
Canada |
|
|---|---|---|
|
Optimisation (of current systems, products, processes etc.) |
42% |
43% |
|
Building Resilience (against disruption) |
30% |
30% |
|
Growth (new markets, revenue, etc.) |
28% |
27% |
|
Other |
0% |
0% |
|
UK |
Germany |
Italy |
France |
Netherlands |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Optimisation (of current systems, products, processes etc.) |
42% |
39% |
44% |
40% |
46% |
|
Building Resilience (against disruption) |
29% |
30% |
26% |
28% |
26% |
|
Growth (new markets, revenue, etc.) |
29% |
32% |
31% |
32% |
28% |
|
Other |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
|
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Optimisation (of current systems, products, processes etc.) |
41% |
40% |
41% |
40% |
40% |
42% |
42% |
|
Building Resilience (against disruption) |
31% |
23% |
29% |
30% |
30% |
26% |
26% |
|
Growth (new markets, revenue, etc.) |
28% |
33% |
31% |
30% |
30% |
32% |
31% |
|
Other |
0% |
3% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Does your company have a dedicated lab or think tank that focuses on innovation?
| North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes |
56% |
59% |
58% |
| No |
44% |
41% |
42% |
|
I don't know |
0% |
0% |
0% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Yes |
60% |
44% |
| No |
40% |
56% |
| I don't know | 0% |
0% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes |
53% |
66% |
62% |
64% |
54% |
| No |
47% |
34% |
38% |
36% |
46% |
| I don't know |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
| Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes |
56% |
46% |
58% |
78% |
62% |
50% |
64% |
| No |
44% |
54% |
42% |
22% |
38% |
50% |
36% |
| I don't know |
0% |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which of the following best describes your organisation's top three challenges when it comes to innovation?
Shown: Ranked #1
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Architectural constraints (including technical debt) |
8% |
7% |
8% |
|
Board/executive buy-in |
5% |
2% |
5% |
|
Culture (collaboration, curiosity, exploration) |
6% |
10% |
6% |
|
Justifying investment in innovation |
10% |
9% |
11% |
|
Lack of diversity of perspective |
10% |
8% |
9% |
|
Lack of governance and infrastructure |
9% |
10% |
11% |
|
Operational challenges (for example, prioritising "business as usual" over innovation) |
6% |
9% |
9% |
|
Organisational structure (teams, processes) |
7% |
7% |
8% |
|
Regulatory and compliance requirements |
15% |
17% |
15% |
|
Security risks |
15% |
13% |
13% |
|
Talent (upskilling, staff retention, resource capacity) |
9% |
8% |
5% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
|
Architectural constraints (including technical debt) |
9% |
5% |
|
Board/executive buy-in |
5% |
6% |
|
Culture (collaboration, curiosity, exploration) |
6% |
7% |
|
Justifying investment in innovation |
10% |
11% |
|
Lack of diversity of perspective |
11% |
9% |
|
Lack of governance and infrastructure |
8% |
12% |
|
Operational challenges (for example, prioritising "business as usual" over innovation) |
5% |
7% |
|
Organisational structure (teams, processes) |
8% |
4% |
|
Regulatory and compliance requirements |
15% |
15% |
|
Security risks |
13% |
18% |
|
Talent (upskilling, staff retention, resource capacity) |
10% |
6% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Architectural constraints (including technical debt) |
10% |
6% |
6% |
4% |
6% |
|
Board/executive buy-in |
1% |
2% |
4% |
0% |
0% |
|
Culture (collaboration, curiosity, exploration) |
7% |
11% |
16% |
10% |
12% |
|
Justifying investment in innovation |
8% |
8% |
8% |
12% |
10% |
|
Lack of diversity of perspective |
6% |
8% |
2% |
8% |
19% |
|
Lack of governance and infrastructure |
9% |
13% |
6% |
15% |
6% |
|
Operational challenges (for example, prioritising "business as usual" over innovation) |
13% |
4% |
6% |
8% |
10% |
|
Organisational structure (teams, processes) |
6% |
14% |
8% |
0% |
4% |
|
Regulatory and compliance requirements |
23% |
8% |
24% |
10% |
19% |
|
Security risks |
11% |
13% |
12% |
23% |
8% |
|
Talent (upskilling, staff retention, resource capacity) |
6% |
13% |
8% |
10% |
6% |
| Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Architectural constraints (including technical debt) |
14% |
6% |
2% |
6% |
4% |
15% |
8% |
|
Board/executive buy-in |
2% |
0% |
8% |
4% |
8% |
6% |
12% |
|
Culture (collaboration, curiosity, exploration) |
2% |
11% | 4% | 8% | 6% | 4% | 6% |
|
Justifying investment in innovation |
18% |
6% | 12% | 12% | 10% | 8% | 16% |
|
Lack of diversity of perspective |
8% |
9% | 10% | 8% | 14% | 8% | 4% |
|
Lack of governance and infrastructure |
20% |
8% | 14% | 6% | 12% | 6% | 8% |
|
Operational challenges (for example, prioritising "business as usual" over innovation) |
0% |
14% | 12% | 8% | 14% | 8% | 10% |
|
Organisational structure (teams, processes) |
8% |
8% | 12% | 4% | 6% | 10% | 10% |
|
Regulatory and compliance requirements |
18% |
11% | 8% | 21% | 6% | 25% | 16% |
|
Security risks |
8% |
16% | 10% | 17% | 14% | 10% | 6% |
|
Talent (upskilling, staff retention, resource capacity) |
2% |
11% | 8% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 4% |
Who is the key person responsible for driving innovation at your company?
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Executive Officer or equivalent |
5% |
4% |
3% |
| Chief Information Officer or equivalent |
9% |
12% |
9% |
| Chief Innovation/Strategy officer of equivalent |
45% |
47% |
51% |
| Chief Operations Officer or equivalent |
5% |
6% |
7% |
| Chief Product Officer or equivalent |
5% |
3% |
3% |
| Chief Technology Officer or equivalent |
31% |
28% |
27% |
| Other |
0% |
0% |
0% |
| There is no-one driving innovation at my company |
0% |
0% |
0% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Executive Officer or equivalent |
6% |
4% |
| Chief Information Officer or equivalent |
10% |
6% |
| Chief Innovation/Strategy officer of equivalent |
45% |
44% |
| Chief Operations Officer or equivalent |
4% |
8% |
| Chief Product Officer or equivalent |
4% |
7% |
| Chief Technology Officer or equivalent |
31% |
31% |
| Other |
0% |
0% |
| There is no-one driving innovation at my company |
0% |
0% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Executive Officer or equivalent | 1% |
6% |
4% |
2% |
8% |
| Chief Information Officer or equivalent |
17% |
6% |
10% |
12% | 12% |
| Chief Innovation/Strategy officer of equivalent |
33% |
48% |
62% |
54% | 52% |
| Chief Operations Officer or equivalent |
9% |
6% |
4% |
2% | 6% |
| Chief Product Officer or equivalent |
4% |
4% | 2% | 0% | 4% |
| Chief Technology Officer or equivalent |
35% |
30% | 18% | 30% | 18% |
| Other | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| There is no-one driving innovation at my company |
0% |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Executive Officer or equivalent | 2% | 8% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 0% | 10% |
| Chief Information Officer or equivalent | 14% | 4% | 16% | 10% | 8% | 6% | 12% |
| Chief Innovation/Strategy officer of equivalent | 46% | 42% | 52% | 50% | 56% | 60% | 36% |
| Chief Operations Officer or equivalent | 6% | 12% | 4% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% |
| Chief Product Officer or equivalent | 10% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 4% | 0% | 2% |
| Chief Technology Officer or equivalent | 22% | 32% | 26% | 30% | 24% | 28% | 34% |
| Other | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| There is no-one driving innovation at my company | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which of the following type(s) of technologies, if any, does your company use?
Shown: "Currently using" responses. Multiple responses permitted.
| North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
5G |
42% |
46% |
60% |
|
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
52% |
55% |
52% |
|
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
27% |
30% |
32% |
|
Blockchain |
46% |
41% |
42% |
|
Cloud |
76% |
72% |
74% |
|
Edge computing |
49% |
48% |
42% |
|
Internet of Things |
70% |
65% |
75% |
|
Metaverse |
9% |
7% |
8% |
|
No code/Low code |
42% |
35% |
25% |
|
Quantum computing |
24% |
24% |
16% |
|
Robotics |
23% |
26% |
25% |
|
Web 3 |
24% |
19% |
28% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
|
5G |
57% |
35% |
|
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
42% |
44% |
|
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
22% |
41% |
|
Blockchain |
46% |
47% |
|
Cloud |
77% |
74% |
|
Edge computing |
51% |
45% |
|
Internet of Things |
74% |
60% |
|
Metaverse |
10% |
8% |
|
No code/Low code |
42% |
40% |
|
Quantum computing |
25% |
22% |
|
Robotics |
23% |
25% |
|
Web 3 |
24% |
23% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5G |
63% |
58% |
60% |
50% |
34% |
|
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
39% |
34% |
52% |
60% |
54% |
|
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
11% |
28% |
52% |
34% |
44% |
|
Blockchain |
32% |
44% |
48% |
44% |
44% |
|
Cloud |
67% |
60% |
78% |
84% |
80% |
|
Edge computing |
40% |
54% |
44% |
50% |
58% |
|
Internet of Things |
57% |
64% |
72% |
72% |
70% |
|
Metaverse |
7% |
12% |
2% |
10% |
2% |
|
No code/Low code |
33% |
46% |
20% |
34% |
42% |
|
Quantum computing |
19% |
32% |
18% |
28% |
26% |
|
Robotics |
32% |
26% |
26% |
28% |
8% |
|
Web 3 |
16% |
22% |
22% |
24% |
16% |
| Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5G |
64% |
30% |
50% |
58% |
56% |
52% |
54% |
|
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
44% |
62% |
62% |
66% |
68% |
58% |
58% |
|
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
18% |
52% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
|
Blockchain |
28% |
50% | 38% | 44% | 44% | 48% | 46% |
|
Cloud |
72% |
86% | 78% | 64% | 80% | 66% | 72% |
|
Edge computing |
44% |
52% | 32% | 48% | 42% | 34% | 30% |
|
Internet of Things |
72% |
72% | 70% | 82% | 72% | 80% | 74% |
|
Metaverse |
2% |
8% | 2% | 14% | 16% | 4% | 4% |
|
No code/Low code |
14% |
22% | 30% | 22% | 28% | 34% | 22% |
|
Quantum computing |
16% |
16% | 16% | 18% | 24% | 8% | 18% |
|
Robotics |
22% |
24% | 28% | 26% | 24% | 26% | 26% |
|
Web 3 |
30% |
28% | 22% | 32% | 30% | 26% | 28% |
How concerned are you about the security risks (for example, breaches, data loss, improper controls, poor access management) associated with implementing innovative new technologies?
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 (Very concerned) | 38% | 39% | 53% |
| 4 | 47% | 38% | 30% |
| 3 (Moderately concerned) | 15% | 23% | 16% |
| 2 | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| 1 (Not at all concerned) | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| US
|
Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 (Very concerned) | 35% | 44% |
| 4 | 50% | 38% |
| 3 (Moderately concerned) | 14% | 18% |
| 2 | 1% | 0% |
| 1 (Not at all concerned) | 0% | 0% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 (Very concerned) | 30% | 24% | 60% | 38% | 50% |
| 4 | 43% | 52% | 16% | 48% | 30% |
| 3 (Moderately concerned) | 27% | 24% | 24% | 14% | 20% |
| 2 |
0% |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 1 (Not at all concerned) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 (Very concerned) | 42% | 64% | 62% | 44% | 48% | 56% | 50% |
| 4 | 36% | 12% | 24% | 42% | 36% | 28% | 32% |
| 3 (Moderately concerned) | 20% | 22% | 14% | 14% | 12% | 16% | 18% |
| 2 | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 0% |
| 1 (Not at all concerned) | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which of the following areas do you consider the MOST important for maintaining an innovative organisation?
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Building the right processes and activities | 21% | 22% | 26% |
| Enabling an agile technology environment
|
31% | 20% | 23% |
| Fostering an innovative culture
|
36% | 40% | 33% |
| Hiring the right talent (different roles and specialisms)
|
11% | 17% | 18% |
| None of the above
|
1% | 1% | 0% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Building the right processes and activities | 19% | 27% |
| Enabling an agile technology environment | 33% | 24% |
| Fostering an innovative culture | 37% | 33% |
| Hiring the right talent (different roles and specialisms) | 10% | 16% |
| None of the above | 1% | 0% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building the right processes and activities | 23% | 20% | 22% | 16% | 28% |
| Enabling an agile technology environment | 17% | 24% | 26% | 26% | 10% |
| Fostering an innovative culture | 44% | 48% | 26% | 42% | 36% |
| Hiring the right talent (different roles and specialisms) |
15% |
6% | 26% | 14% | 26% |
| None of the above | 1% | 2% | 0% | 2% | 0% |
| Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building the right processes and activities | 18% | 26% | 34% | 24% | 26% | 28% | 32% |
| Enabling an agile technology environment | 30% | 22% | 22% | 18% | 20% | 24% | 24% |
| Fostering an innovative culture | 46% | 30% | 28% | 32% | 30% | 30% | 20% |
| Hiring the right talent (different roles and specialisms) | 6% | 22% | 16% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 22% |
| None of the above | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
What skills-related gaps, if any, impede innovation at your company?
Multiple responses permitted.
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Collaboration |
20% |
17% | 18% |
| Communication and organisation change enablement | 24% | 24% | 24% |
| Design thinking | 38% | 37% | 34% |
| Enterprise agility | 36% | 36% | 34% |
| Lack of training | 18% | 20% | 19% |
| Leadership | 11% | 12% | 17% |
| Project management | 20% | 21% | 24% |
| Solution architecture | 37% | 38% | 36% |
| Strategic thinking | 27% | 28% | 32% |
| Technical knowledge | 33% | 30% | 29% |
| Other | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| None | 1% | 2% | 1% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Collaboration | 20% | 18% |
| Communication and organisation change enablement | 25% | 18% |
| Design thinking | 38% | 39% |
| Enterprise agility | 34% | 39% |
| Lack of training | 19% | 17% |
| Leadership | 11% | 12% |
| Project management | 19% | 24% |
| Solution architecture | 36% | 41% |
| Strategic thinking | 28% | 22% |
| Technical knowledge | 34% | 32% |
| Other | 0% | 0% |
| None | 1% | 0% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collaboration |
18% |
12% | 24% | 12% | 20% |
| Communication and organisation change enablement |
29% |
24% | 16% | 28% | 16% |
| Design thinking |
43% |
36% | 44% | 30% | 26% |
| Enterprise agility |
35% |
28% | 40% | 40% | 36% |
| Lack of training |
24% |
18% |
32% |
6% | 18% |
| Leadership |
10% |
12% | 14% | 14% | 12% |
| Project management |
25% |
18% | 18% | 18% | 20% |
| Solution architecture |
45% |
36% | 34% |
44% |
26% |
| Strategic thinking |
27% |
40% |
22% |
20% | 34% |
| Technical knowledge |
36% |
34% |
26% |
32% | 16% |
| Other |
0% |
0% | 0% |
2% |
0% |
| None |
3% |
2% | 4% | 2% | 0% |
| Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collaboration | 14% | 12% | 24% | 16% | 16% | 28% | 22% |
| Communication and organisation change enablement |
22% |
30% |
30% |
20% | 26% | 14% | 16% |
| Design thinking |
38% |
32% | 24% | 38% | 32% | 40% | 42% |
| Enterprise agility |
34% |
40% |
38% |
24% | 26% | 42% | 32% |
| Lack of training |
24% |
18% | 20% | 14% | 18% | 18% | 24% |
| Leadership |
8% |
24% | 12% | 18% | 20% | 18% | 16% |
| Project management |
24% |
12% | 26% | 30% | 28% | 22% | 16% |
| Solution architecture |
36% |
28% | 34% | 46% | 46% | 28% | 38% |
| Strategic thinking |
30% |
30% | 20% |
36% |
42% | 34% | 40% |
| Technical knowledge |
28% |
26% | 24% | 40% | 32% | 22% | 30% |
| Other |
0% |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| None |
0% |
4% |
0% |
0% |
4% |
0% | 2% |
Are you using any of the following approaches to help drive innovation at your company?
Shown: "Yes, and it enables our innovation, helping us to deliver the results we would like" responses.
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agile | 64% | 68% | 63% |
| Design thinking | 56% | 57% | 56% |
| Hackathons | 43% | 37% | 34% |
| Journey mapping | 54% | 49% | 53% |
| Lean start-up method |
31% |
38% | 39% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Agile | 65% | 60% |
| Design thinking | 56% | 58% |
| Hackathons | 43% | 44% |
| Journey mapping | 53% | 57% |
| Lean start-up method | 30% | 35% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agile | 65% | 68% | 74% | 72% | 62% |
| Design thinking | 59% | 56% | 54% | 62% | 52% |
| Hackathons | 40% | 44% | 28% | 36% | 38% |
| Journey mapping | 50% | 50% | 54% | 46% | 46% |
| Lean start-up method | 35% | 34% | 36% | 48% | 38% |
| Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agile | 62% | 66% | 60% | 70% | 66% | 56% | 74% |
| Design thinking | 46% | 62% | 52% | 64% | 62% | 52% | 70% |
| Hackathons |
42% |
48% | 38% | 18% | 26% | 36% | 38% |
| Journey mapping | 44% | 56% | 56% | 58% | 46% | 60% | 36% |
| Lean start-up method | 38% | 46% | 36% | 44% | 28% | 42% | 36% |
How well do innovation leaders bridge the gap between technology and business needs at your company?
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Very well |
28% | 31% | 30% |
| 4 Somewhat well |
59% | 55% | 54% |
| 3 Neutral |
13% | 13% | 16% |
| 2 Somewhat poorly |
0% | 1% | 0% |
| 1 Very poorly |
0% | 0% | 0% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Very well |
30% | 21% |
| 4 Somewhat well |
57% | 64% |
| 3 Neutral |
13% | 15% |
| 2 Somewhat poorly |
0% | 0% |
| 1 Very poorly |
0% | 0% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Very well |
29% | 40% | 22% | 38% | 30% |
| 4 Somewhat well |
58% | 50% | 60% | 50% | 52% |
| 3 Neutral |
12% | 8% | 14% | 12% | 18% |
| 2 Somewhat poorly |
1% |
2% | 4% | 0% | 0% |
| 1 Very poorly |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Very well |
28% | 26% | 38% | 30% | 34% | 26% | 24% |
| 4 Somewhat well |
56% | 52% | 48% | 64% | 46% | 56% | 72% |
| 3 Neutral |
16% | 20% | 14% | 6% | 20% | 18% | 4% |
| 2 Somewhat poorly |
0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 1 Very poorly |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
When it comes to innovation, how well do your company’s business and technology leaders collaborate in the following areas?
Shown: Top 2 Box scores (aggregate percentage for "Very well" (5) and "Somewhat well" (4) on our 5-point scale).
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Educating non-technical board members on the benefits of investing in innovation | 58% | 57% | 62% |
| Governance, risk and compliance | 81% |
76% |
70% |
| Innovation culture | 64% | 67% |
69% |
| Innovation processes | 70% | 67% | 67% |
| Innovation strategy | 81% | 78% |
83% |
| Knowledge sharing | 80% | 74% | 83% |
| Strategic leadership | 83% | 80% | 76% |
| Talent upskilling and retention | 68% | 68% | 71% |
| Transformational change | 74% | 71% | 71% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Educating non-technical board members on the benefits of investing in innovation | 56% | 64% |
| Governance, risk and compliance | 82% | 76% |
| Innovation culture | 64% | 66% |
| Innovation processes | 69% | 73% |
| Innovation strategy | 81% | 79% |
| Knowledge sharing | 80% | 80% |
| Strategic leadership | 83% | 81% |
| Talent upskilling and retention | 70% | 62% |
| Transformational change | 76% | 70% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Educating non-technical board members on the benefits of investing in innovation | 52% |
70% |
56% | 54% | 56% |
| Governance, risk and compliance | 77% | 78% | 68% |
66% |
90% |
| Innovation culture | 69% | 64% | 66% | 68% | 66% |
| Innovation processes | 67% | 78% | 64% | 68% | 58% |
| Innovation strategy | 80% | 82% | 68% | 80% | 78% |
| Knowledge sharing | 74% |
84% |
68% | 76% | 66% |
| Strategic leadership | 83% | 76% | 80% | 84% | 72% |
| Talent upskilling and retention | 73% |
74% |
62% | 70% | 54% |
| Transformational change | 65% | 82% |
64% |
72% | 78% |
| Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Educating non-technical board members on the benefits of investing in innovation | 58% | 60% | 72% | 58% | 66% | 56% | 64% |
| Governance, risk and compliance | 66% |
68% |
78% | 66% | 70% | 74% | 68% |
| Innovation culture | 66% | 68% | 64% | 74% | 76% |
66% |
70% |
| Innovation processes | 70% | 64% | 62% | 74% | 70% | 64% | 74% |
| Innovation strategy | 80% | 88% | 84% | 80% | 82% |
82% |
78% |
| Knowledge sharing | 76% | 82% | 82% | 94% | 80% |
86% |
80% |
| Strategic leadership | 82% | 60% | 76% | 86% | 74% | 80% | 66% |
| Talent upskilling and retention | 82% | 62% | 68% | 74% | 70% | 68% | 68% |
| Transformational change | 70% |
74% |
72% | 74% |
68% |
68% | 68% |
What impact is technical debt having on your ability to innovate?
| North America
|
Europe | APAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Significant impact |
19% | 19% | 25% |
| 4 | 50% | 51% | 44% |
| 3 Moderate Impact |
29% | 28% | 29% |
| 2 | 1% | 2% | 1% |
| 1 No impact |
1% | 0% | 1% |
| US
|
Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Significant impact |
23% | 7% |
| 4 | 49% | 54% |
| 3 Moderate Impact |
26% | 38% |
| 2 | 1% | 1% |
| 1 No impact | 1% | 0% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Significant impact |
17% | 16% | 20% | 24% | 20% |
| 4 | 60% | 58% | 40% | 48% | 40% |
| 3 Moderate Impact |
23% | 26% | 36% | 26% | 36% |
| 2 | 0% | 0% | 4% | 2% | 4% |
| 1 No impact |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Significant impact |
24% | 28% | 30% | 18% | 28% | 24% | 26% |
| 4 | 50% | 28% | 40% | 60% | 46% | 40% | 40% |
| 3 Moderate Impact |
26% | 38% | 30% | 20% | 24% | 36% | 34% |
| 2 | 0% | 2% | 0% | 2% |
2% |
0% | 0% |
| 1 No impact |
0% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
What percentage of the resources below would you estimate is dedicated to resolving technical debt?
Shown: Mean scores
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IT budget ($) | 32% | 34% | 29% |
| IT effort (human resource) | 20% | 19% | 24% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| IT budget ($) | 32% | 31% |
| IT effort (human resource) | 19% | 23% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT budget ($) | 38% | 39% | 27% | 30% | 29% |
| IT effort (human resource) | 14% | 19% | 27% | 20% | 21% |
| Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT budget ($) | 31% | 29% | 27% | 28% | 32% | 25% | 32% |
| IT effort (human resource) | 17% | 38% | 21% | 23% | 21% | 23% | 25% |
What are the top three strategies that your company prioritises when dealing with technical debt?
Shown: Ranked #1
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appointing a technology leader as responsible and accountable for technical debt solutions | 10% | 7% | 10% |
| Educating teams on technical debt and how to report it | 13% | 13% | 13% |
| Formulating and following guidelines to managing technical debt | 12% | 9% | 9% |
| Having a knowledge base to provide information even when specific employees have left the team or business | 11% | 14% | 12% |
| Having a process in place to track and report technical debt | 11% |
13% |
11% |
| Incorporating technical debt management into innovation strategies | 9% | 12% | 10% |
| Revamping software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs (e.g., refactoring code, etc) | 11% | 9% | 10% |
| Tracking software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs | 11% | 11% | 14% |
| Tracking technical debt in new systems | 12% | 12% | 11% |
| Other strategies | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| US | Canada | |
|---|---|---|
| Appointing a technology leader as responsible and accountable for technical debt solutions |
9% |
10% |
| Educating teams on technical debt and how to report it |
13% |
14% |
| Formulating and following guidelines to managing technical debt |
10% |
15% |
| Having a knowledge base to provide information even when specific employees have left the team or business |
12% |
9% |
| Having a process in place to track and report technical debt |
13% |
9% |
| Incorporating technical debt management into innovation strategies |
10% |
7% |
| Revamping software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs (e.g., refactoring code, etc) |
12% |
7% |
| Tracking software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs |
11% |
11% |
| Tracking technical debt in new systems |
10% |
18% |
| Other strategies | 0% | 0% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appointing a technology leader as responsible and accountable for technical debt solutions |
10% |
2% |
8% |
6% |
4% |
| Educating teams on technical debt and how to report it |
13% |
14% |
16% |
14% |
8% |
| Formulating and following guidelines to managing technical debt |
8% |
6% |
10% |
10% |
12% |
| Having a knowledge base to provide information even when specific employees have left the team or business |
16% |
16% |
10% |
18% |
8% |
| Having a process in place to track and report technical debt |
15% |
14% |
12% |
10% |
16% |
| Incorporating technical debt management into innovation strategies |
8% |
22% |
18% |
4% |
10% |
| Revamping software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs (e.g., refactoring code, etc) |
5% |
16% |
4% |
18% |
8% |
| Tracking software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs |
10% |
6% |
14% |
4% |
20% |
| Tracking technical debt in new systems |
15% |
4% |
8% |
16% |
14% |
| Other strategies | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
|
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appointing a technology leader as responsible and accountable for technical debt solutions |
8% |
12% |
12% |
8% |
10% |
12% |
12% |
| Educating teams on technical debt and how to report it |
12% |
8% |
10% |
18% |
10% |
18% |
10% |
| Formulating and following guidelines to managing technical debt |
17% |
10% |
14% |
4% |
6% |
4% |
12% |
| Having a knowledge base to provide information even when specific employees have left the team or business |
19% |
6% |
4% |
14% |
12% |
18% |
4% |
| Having a process in place to track and report technical debt |
12% |
22% |
6% |
10% |
12% |
4% |
16% |
| Incorporating technical debt management into innovation strategies |
6% |
8% |
16% |
6% |
8% |
14% |
4% |
| Revamping software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs (e.g., refactoring code, etc) |
10% |
4% |
8% |
16% |
14% |
6% |
8% |
| Tracking software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs |
8% |
20% |
20% |
10% |
10% |
16% |
22% |
| Tracking technical debt in new systems |
8% |
10% |
10% | 14% | 18% | 8% | 12% |
| Other strategies | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which of the following technologies, if any, is your organisation using to help reduce or alleviate technical debt?
Shown: "Currently using" responses. Multiple responses permitted.
|
North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
5G |
48% |
49% |
47% |
|
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
34% |
37% |
44% |
|
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
15% |
19% |
12% |
|
Blockchain |
28% |
26% |
23% |
|
Cloud |
65% |
65% |
67% |
|
Edge computing |
36% |
35% |
27% |
|
Internet of Things |
64% |
58% |
66% |
|
Low code/no code |
18% |
18% |
16% |
|
Metaverse |
4% |
4% |
3% |
|
Quantum computing |
18% |
18% |
15% |
|
Robotics |
12% |
12% |
18% |
| Web 3 | 13% | 9% | 12% |
|
US |
Canada |
|
|---|---|---|
|
5G |
53% |
33% |
|
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
35% |
32% |
|
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
13% |
20% |
|
Blockchain |
29% |
27% |
|
Cloud |
65% |
65% |
|
Edge computing |
37% |
33% |
|
Internet of Things |
68% |
53% |
|
Low code/no code |
18% |
19% |
|
Metaverse |
5% |
3% |
|
Quantum computing |
18% |
18% |
|
Robotics |
12% |
11% |
| Web | 14% | 8% |
|
UK |
Germany |
Italy |
France |
Netherlands |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5G |
61% |
52% |
48% |
40% |
30% |
|
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
34% |
30% |
44% |
46% |
32% |
|
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
8% |
20% |
18% |
26% |
34% |
|
Blockchain |
20% |
32% |
32% |
26% |
30% |
|
Cloud |
64% |
56% |
60% |
74% |
72% |
|
Edge computing |
31% |
40% |
26% |
44% |
36% |
|
Internet of Things |
54% |
56% |
58% |
64% |
62% |
|
Low code/no code |
10% |
18% |
16% |
18% |
38% |
|
Metaverse |
4% |
2% |
6% |
4% |
2% |
|
Quantum computing |
11% |
26% |
14% |
30% |
20% |
|
Robotics |
12% |
14% |
12% |
16% |
6% |
| Web 3 |
12% |
14% | 4% | 6% | 8% |
|
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
5G |
56% |
30% |
44% |
52% |
50% |
50% |
44% |
|
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
38% |
38% |
52% |
46% |
46% |
42% |
56% |
|
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
4% |
28% |
10% |
10% |
8% |
12% |
0% |
|
Blockchain |
20% |
30% |
24% |
20% |
20% |
26% |
28% |
|
Cloud |
64% |
80% |
66% |
58% |
74% |
60% |
60% |
|
Edge computing |
30% |
28% |
30% |
24% |
28% |
20% |
24% |
|
Internet of Things |
64% |
62% |
66% |
66% |
68% |
70% |
64% |
|
Low code/no code |
8% |
22% |
20% |
10% |
18% |
20% |
14% |
|
Metaverse |
4% |
6% |
2% |
0% |
2% |
4% |
2% |
|
Quantum computing |
18% |
16% |
12% |
18% |
18% |
8% |
14% |
|
Robotics |
14% |
26% |
18% |
16% |
12% |
20% |
14% |
| Web 3 | 10% | 10% | 12% | 8% | 16% | 16% | 10% |
If an economic recession happens, how do you anticipate your technology innovation strategy/investments will change?
|
North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| We expect to advance our technology innovation strategy/investments |
36% |
34% |
27% |
| We expect to cut back on our technology innovation strategy/investments |
46% |
44% |
53% |
| We anticipate no changes to our technology innovation strategy/investments |
18% |
21% |
20% |
| I don't know | 0% | 1% | 0% |
|
US |
Canada |
|
|---|---|---|
| We expect to advance our technology innovation strategy/investments |
37% |
30% |
| We expect to cut back on our technology innovation strategy/investments |
46% |
48% |
| We anticipate no changes to our technology innovation strategy/investments |
17% |
22% |
| I don't know | 0% | 0% |
|
UK |
Germany |
Italy |
France |
Netherlands |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| We expect to advance our technology innovation strategy/investments |
42% |
38% |
26% |
38% |
18% |
| We expect to cut back on our technology innovation strategy/investments |
32% |
42% |
62% |
42% |
56% |
| We anticipate no changes to our technology innovation strategy/investments |
26% |
20% |
10% |
20% |
26% |
| I don't know | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% |
|
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| We expect to advance our technology innovation strategy/investments |
34% |
18% |
24% |
22% |
42% |
20% |
30% |
| We expect to cut back on our technology innovation strategy/investments |
46% |
52% |
54% |
60% |
44% |
60% |
48% |
| We anticipate no changes to our technology innovation strategy/investments |
20% |
28% |
22% |
18% |
14% |
20% |
22% |
| I don't know | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
| Sample Size | 400 respondents | 300 respondents | 300 respondents |
Industry
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
| Financial Services: (Net) | 17% | 20% | 11% |
| Financial Services - Asset & Wealth Management | 4% | 4% | 2% |
| Financial Services - Banking & Capital Markets | 4% | 5% | 3% |
| Financial Services - Mortgage & Consumer Lending | 3% | 2% | 2% |
| Financial Services - Payments | 3% | 3% | 1% |
| Financial Services - Private Equity | 1% | 4% | 1% |
| Financial Services - Other | - | - | - |
| Insurance (other than Healthcare Payer) | 2% | 2% | 2% |
| Technology, Media, Telecommunications: (Net) | 13% | 13% | 20% |
| Technology (Software/High-Tech/Electronics) | 3% | 4% | 8% |
| Media and Entertainment | 5% | 5% | 6% |
| Telecommunications and Data Infrastructure | 5% | 4% | 6% |
| Consumer Products & Services: (Net) | 12% | 21% | 14% |
| Consumer Packaged Goods | 7% | 10% | 6% |
| Retail | 5% | 11% | 8% |
| Healthcare: (Net) | 16% | 10% | 18% |
| Healthcare - Integrated Delivery Systems (Provider & Payer) | 6% | 7% | 4% |
| Healthcare Payer/Insurance | 7% | 2% | 6% |
| Healthcare Provider/Services | 3% | 1% | 8% |
| Manufacturing & Distribution: (Net) | 11% | 20% | 16% |
| Automotive | 1% | 4% | 2% |
| Biotechnology/Medical Devices | 2% | 1% | 3% |
| Chemicals and Materials | 2% | 2% | - |
| Manufacturing (other than Technology) | 1% | 4% | 4% |
| Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences | 1% | 4% | 1% |
| Transportation and Logistics | 3% | 3% | 2% |
| Warehousing/Distribution | 1% | 2% | 4% |
| Energy & Utilities: (Net) | 10% | 10% | 15% |
| Mining | 2% | 2% | 4% |
| Oil and Gas | 3% | 2% | 3% |
| Power and Utilities | 3% | 2% | 5% |
| Renewables | 2% | 4% | 3% |
| Public Sector (National Gov. only): (Net) | 21% | 6% | 6% |
| Government | 21% | 6% | 6% |
Size (Revenue in USD)
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
| Less than $25 million | - | - | - |
| $25 million - $99.99 million | - | - | - |
| $100 million - $499.99 million | - | - | - |
| $500 million - $999.99 million | 13% | 25% | 30% |
| $1 billion - $4.99 billion | 31% | 29% | 18% |
| $5 billion - $9.99 billion | 26% | 21% | 23% |
| $10 billion or more | 30% | 25% | 29% |
Size (Assets Under Management in USD)
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
| Less than $250 million (0.15) | - | - | - |
| $250 million - $999.99 million (0.62) | - | - | - |
| $1 billion - $4.99 billion (3) | - | - | - |
| $5 billion - $9.99 billion (7.50) | 23% | 29% | 33% |
| $10 billion - $24.99 billion (17.50) | 17% | 29% | 22% |
| $25 billion - $49.99 billion (37.50) | 21% | 17% | 26% |
| $50 billion or more (62.50) | 39% | 25% | 19% |
Ownership Type
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
| Publicly held, for profit entity | 48% | 48% | 56% |
| Privately held, for profit entity - preparing to become publicly held | 8% | 14% | 12% |
| Privately held, for profit entity - no current plans to become publicly held | 20% | 32% | 26% |
| Government agency | 21% | 6% | 6% |
| Non-profit organisation | 3% | - | - |
Company Headquarters
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
| Australia | - | - | 16% |
| Canada | 25% | - | - |
| China | - | - | 17% |
| France | - | 17% | - |
| Germany | - | 17% | - |
| Hong Kong | - | - | 16% |
| India | - | - | 17% |
| Italy | - | 17% | - |
| Japan | - | - | 17% |
| Netherlands | - | 17% | - |
| Singapore | - | - | 17% |
| United Kingdom | - | 32% | - |
| United States | 75% | - | - |
Job Title
| North America | Europe | APAC | |
| Chief Information Officer | 12% | 19% | 20% |
| Chief Information Security Officer | 14% | 22% | 8% |
| Chief Technology Officer | 11% | 18% | 23% |
| Director of Information Technology | 25% | 21% | 20% |
| Senior Vice President of Information Technology | 17% | 9% | 15% |
| Vice President of Information Technology | 21% | 11% | 14% |
| US | Canada | |
| Sample Size | 300 respondents | 100 respondents |
Industry
| US | Canada | |
| Financial Services: (Net) | 14% | 23% |
| Financial Services - Asset & Wealth Management | 2% | 9% |
| Financial Services - Banking & Capital Markets | 3% | 6% |
| Financial Services - Mortgage & Consumer Lending | 4% | - |
| Financial Services - Payments | 3% | 1% |
| Financial Services - Private Equity | 2% | 1% |
| Financial Services - Other | - | - |
| Insurance (other than Healthcare Payer) | - | 6% |
| Technology, Media, Telecommunications: (Net) | 13% | 15% |
| Technology (Software/High-Tech/Electronics) | 4% | 3% |
| Media and Entertainment | 4% | 6% |
| Telecommunications and Data Infrastructure | 5% | 6% |
| Consumer Products & Services: (Net) | 14% | 9% |
| Consumer Packaged Goods | 8% | 5% |
| Retail | 6% | 4% |
| Healthcare: (Net) | 19% | 10% |
| Healthcare - Integrated Delivery Systems (Provider & Payer) | 6% | 6% |
| Healthcare Payer/Insurance | 9% | 1% |
| Healthcare Provider/Services | 4% | 3% |
| Manufacturing & Distribution: (Net) | 11% | 7% |
| Automotive | 1% | 1% |
| Biotechnology/Medical Devices | 2% | - |
| Chemicals and Materials | 2% | 3% |
| Manufacturing (other than Technology) | 1% | - |
| Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences | 1% | - |
| Transportation and Logistics | 3% | 2% |
| Warehousing/Distribution | 1% | 1% |
| Energy & Utilities: (Net) | 5% | 24% |
| Mining | 1% | 7% |
| Oil and Gas | 1% | 8% |
| Power and Utilities | 2% | 4% |
| Renewables | 1% | 5% |
| Public Sector (National Gov. only): (Net) | 24% | 12% |
| Government | 24% | 12% |
Size (Revenue in USD)
| US | Canada | |
| Less than $25 million | - | - |
| $25 million - $99.99 million | - | - |
| $100 million - $499.99 million | - | - |
| $500 million - $999.99 million | 10% | 20% |
| $1 billion - $4.99 billion | 31% | 33% |
| $5 billion - $9.99 billion | 27% | 24% |
| $10 billion or more | 32% | 23% |
Size (Assets Under Management in USD)
| US | Canada | |
| Less than $250 million (0.15) | - | - |
| $250 million - $999.99 million (0.62) | - | - |
| $1 billion - $4.99 billion (3) | - | - |
| $5 billion - $9.99 billion (7.50) | 27% | 12% |
| $10 billion - $24.99 billion (17.50) | 20% | 12% |
| $25 billion - $49.99 billion (37.50) | 18% | 29% |
| $50 billion or more (62.50) | 35% | 47% |
Ownership Type
| US | Canada | |
| Publicly held, for profit entity | 46% | 52% |
| Privately held, for profit entity - preparing to become publicly held | 8% | 9% |
| Privately held, for profit entity - no current plans to become publicly held | 18% | 25% |
| Government agency | 24% | 13% |
| Non-profit organisation | 4% | 1% |
Company Headquarters
| US | Canada | |
| Canada | - | 100% |
| United States | 100% | - |
Job Title
| US | Canada | |
| Chief Information Officer | 10% | 18% |
| Chief Information Security Officer | 14% | 18% |
| Chief Technology Officer | 12% | 8% |
| Director of Information Technology | 27% | 20% |
| Senior Vice President of Information Technology | 16% | 17% |
| Vice President of Information Technology | 21% | 19% |
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
| Sample Size | 100 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents |
Industry
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
| Financial Services: (Net) | 27% | 12% | 16% | 24% | 12% |
| Financial Services - Asset & Wealth Management | 3% | 4% | - | 8% | 4% |
| Financial Services - Banking & Capital Markets | 6% | 8% | 6% | 2% | 4% |
| Financial Services - Mortgage & Consumer Lending | 1% | - | 6% | - | 2% |
| Financial Services - Payments | 4% | - | 2% | 6% | - |
| Financial Services - Private Equity | 9% | - | 2% | 4% | - |
| Financial Services - Other | - | - | - | - | - |
| Insurance (other than Healthcare Payer) | 4% | - | - | 4% | 2% |
| Technology, Media, Telecommunications: (Net) | 19% | 8% | 14% | 12% | 8% |
| Technology (Software/High-Tech/Electronics) | 3% | 4% | 4% | 6% | 4% |
| Media and Entertainment | 12% | 2% | 4% | 2% | - |
| Telecommunications and Data Infrastructure | 4% | 2% | 6% | 4% | 4% |
| Consumer Products & Services: (Net) | 19% | 22% | 16% | 20% | 30% |
| Consumer Packaged Goods | 11% | 8% | 6% | 18% | 8% |
| Retail | 8% | 14% | 10% | 2% | 22% |
| Healthcare: (Net) | 4% | 10% | 16% | 6% | 18% |
| Healthcare - Integrated Delivery Systems (Provider & Payer) | 3% | 2% | 10% | 4% | 18% |
| Healthcare Payer/Insurance | 1% | 6% | - | 2% | - |
| Healthcare Provider/Services | - | 2% | 6% | - | - |
| Manufacturing & Distribution: (Net) | 11% | 40% | 20% | 24% | 14% |
| Automotive | 3% | 10% | 2% | 8% | - |
| Biotechnology/Medical Devices | - | 4% | - | 2% | - |
| Chemicals and Materials | 2% | 4% | 4% | - | 2% |
| Manufacturing (other than Technology) | 1% | 8% | 2% | 6% | 6% |
| Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences | 4% | 2% | 4% | 6% | 2% |
| Transportation and Logistics | 1% | 10% | 2% | 2% | - |
| Warehousing/Distribution | - | 2% | 6% | - | 4% |
| Energy & Utilities: (Net) | 10% | 4% | 18% | 8% | 10% |
| Mining | 3% | - | - | 2% | 4% |
| Oil and Gas | 1% | - | 6% | - | 4% |
| Power and Utilities | 2% | - | 8% | 2% | - |
| Renewables | 4% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 2% |
| Public Sector (National Gov. only): (Net) | 10% | 4% | - | 6% | 8% |
| Government | 10% | 4% | - | 6% | 8% |
Size (Revenue in USD)
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
| Less than $25 million | - | - | - | - | - |
| $25 million - $99.99 million | - | - | - | - | - |
| $100 million - $499.99 million | - | - | - | - | - |
| $500 million - $999.99 million | 20% | 11% | 43% | 22% | 33% |
| $1 billion - $4.99 billion | 36% | 32% | 19% | 25% | 25% |
| $5 billion - $9.99 billion | 17% | 30% | 29% | 13% | 22% |
| $10 billion or more | 27% | 27% | 9% | 40% | 20% |
Size (Assets Under Management in USD)
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
| Less than $250 million (0.15) | - | - | - | - | - |
| $250 million - $999.99 million (0.62) | - | - | - | - | - |
| $1 billion - $4.99 billion (3) | - | - | - | - | - |
| $5 billion - $9.99 billion (7.50) | 43% | 33% | - | 10% | 40% |
| $10 billion - $24.99 billion (17.50) | 39% | - | 50% | 20% | - |
| $25 billion - $49.99 billion (37.50) | 9% | 17% | 25% | 40% | - |
| $50 billion or more (62.50) | 9% | 50% | 25% | 30% | 60% |
Ownership Type
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
| Publicly held, for profit entity | 50% | 50% | 48% | 54% | 34% |
| Privately held, for profit entity - preparing to become publicly held | 8% | 14% | 28% | 8% | 18% |
| Privately held, for profit entity - no current plans to become publicly held | 32% | 32% | 24% | 32% | 38% |
| Government agency | 10% | 4% | - | 6% | 10% |
| Non-profit organisation | - | - | - | - | - |
Company Headquarters
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
| France | - | - | - | 100% | - |
| Germany | - | 100% | - | - | - |
| Italy | - | - | 100% | - | - |
| Netherlands | - | - | - | - | 100% |
| United Kingdom | 100% | - | - | - | - |
Job Title
| UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
| Chief Information Officer | 14% | 24% | 22% | 28% | 14% |
| Chief Information Security Officer | 16% | 18% | 26% | 24% | 34% |
| Chief Technology Officer | 19% | 16% | 20% | 18% | 14% |
| Director of Information Technology | 33% | 20% | 6% | 16% | 16% |
| Senior Vice President of Information Technology | 4% | 6% | 18% | 8% | 14% |
| Vice President of Information Technology | 14% | 16% | 8% | 6% | 8% |
|
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample Size | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents |
Industry
|
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Financial Services: (Net) |
12% | 16% | 16% | 8% | 8% | 4% | 10% |
|
Financial Services - Asset & Wealth Management |
2% |
- |
6% | 2% | - | - | - |
|
Financial Services - Banking & Capital Markets |
6% | 4% | 4% | - | 4% | - | 2% |
|
Financial Services - Mortgage & Consumer Lending |
- |
6% |
2% | - | 4% | 2% | 2% |
|
Financial Services - Payments |
2% | - | 2% | 2% | - | 2% | 4% |
|
Financial Services - Private Equity |
- |
2% |
- | 2% | - | - | - |
|
Financial Services - Other |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Insurance (other than Healthcare Payer) |
2% | 4% | 2% | 2% | - | - | 2% |
|
Technology, Media, Telecommunications: (Net) |
22% | 14% | 28% | 16% | 26% | 14% | 14% |
|
Technology (Software/High-Tech/Electronics) |
4% | 12% | 12% | - | 14% |
4% |
8% |
|
Media and Entertainment |
10% | 2% | 12% |
8% |
- | 4% | - |
|
Telecommunications and Data Infrastructure |
8% | - | 4% | 8% | 12% | 6% | 6% |
|
Consumer Products & Services: (Net) |
8% | 4% | 6% | 26% | 20% | 22% | 8% |
|
Consumer Packaged Goods |
2% | 4% | 2% | 16% | 8% | 2% | 6% |
|
Retail |
6% | - | 4% | 10% | 12% | 20% | 2% |
|
Healthcare: (Net) |
6% | 22% | 22% | 14% | 20% | 24% | 22% |
|
Healthcare - Integrated Delivery Systems (Provider & Payer) |
6% | 8% |
2% |
4% | - | 2% | 2% |
|
Healthcare Payer/Insurance |
- | 6% | 4% | 2% | 12% | 12% | 6% |
|
Healthcare Provider/Services |
- | 8% | 16% | 8% | 8% | 10% | 14% |
|
Manufacturing & Distribution: (Net) |
4% | 16% | 12% | 20% | 20% | 22% | 20% |
|
Automotive |
- | - | 4% | 4% | 2% | - | - |
|
Biotechnology/Medical Devices |
2% | - | 2% | 6% | - | 6% | - |
|
Chemicals and Materials |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 4% |
|
Manufacturing (other than Technology) |
- | 8% | 2% | 6% | 10% | - | 2% |
|
Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences |
- | - | - | 2% | 2% | - | - |
|
Transportation and Logistics |
2% | 6% | - | - | 2% | 4% | 6% |
|
Warehousing/Distribution |
- | 2% | 4% | 2% | 4% | 12% | 8% |
|
Energy & Utilities: (Net) |
26% |
24% |
8% | 14% | 6% | 14% | 18% |
|
Mining |
10% | 2% | - |
4% |
- | 8% | 6% |
|
Oil and Gas |
8% |
8% |
2% | - | - | 2% | 8% |
|
Power and Utilities |
6% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - | 2% |
|
Renewables |
2% | - | - | 8% | 6% | 4% | 2% |
|
Public Sector (National Gov. only): (Net) |
22% | 4% | 8% | 2% | - | - | 8% |
|
Government |
22% |
4% |
8% |
2% |
- | - | 8% |
Size (Revenue in USD)
|
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Less than $25 million |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| $25 million - $99.99 million | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| $100 million - $499.99 million | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| $500 million - $999.99 million |
18% |
52% | 42% | 15% | 24% | 33% | 26% |
| $1 billion - $4.99 billion |
31% |
11% | 21% | 11% | 7% | 27% | 24% |
| $5 billion - $9.99 billion |
33% |
21% | 19% | 36% | 15% |
13% |
33% |
| $10 billion or more |
18% |
16% | 18% | 38% | 54% | 27% | 17% |
Size (Assets Under Management in USD)
|
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than $250 million (0.15) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| $250 million - $999.99 million (0.62) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| $1 billion - $4.99 billion (3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
$5 billion - $9.99 billion (7.50) |
60% | 50% | 14% | 33% | - | 50% | 25% |
|
$10 billion - $24.99 billion (17.50) |
- | 33% | 29% | 33% | 25% | - | - |
|
$25 billion - $49.99 billion (37.50) |
- | 17% | 43% |
- |
50% | 50% | 75% |
|
$50 billion or more (62.50) |
40% | - | 14% | 34% | 25% | - | - |
Ownership Type
|
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Publicly held, for profit entity |
54% | 44% | 38% | 84% | 58% | 56% | 32% |
|
Privately held, for profit entity - preparing to become publicly held |
12% | 8% | 28% | 2% | 10% | 10% | 20% |
|
Privately held, for profit entity - no current plans to become publicly held |
12% |
44% |
26% | 12% | 30% |
34% |
40% |
|
Government agency |
22% | 4% | 8% | 2% | 2% | - | 8% |
|
Non-profit organisation |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Company Headquarters
|
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Australia |
100% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| China | - | - | - | - | 100% | - | - |
| Hong Kong | - | - | - | - | - | 100% | - |
| India | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - |
| Japan | - | - | - | 100% | - | - | - |
| Singapore | - | - | 100% | - | - | - | - |
| UAE | - | - | - | - | - | - | 100% |
Job Title
|
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Chief Information Officer |
22% | 24% | 10% | 12% | 24% | 26% | 20% |
|
Chief Information Security Officer |
14% | 8% | 14% | 8% | 2% | 4% | 16% |
|
Chief Technology Officer |
20% | 24% | 26% | 22% | 24% | 20% | 18% |
|
Director of Information Technology |
26% | 12% | 16% | 20% | 28% | 20% | 18% |
|
Senior Vice President of Information Technology |
6% | 22% | 20% | 18% | 8% | 14% | 16% |
|
Vice President of Information Technology |
12% |
10% |
14% | 20% |
14% |
16% | 12% |
